Ravi T v. The District Registrar

O R D E R The learned Counsel for the petitioner has made the following the endorsement. "Permitted to withdraw the petition."

2.The petitioner is granted liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition depending on the result of the trial consequent to registration of Cr.No.38 of 2021 registered under Sections 420, 467, 470, 471, 294(b) and 506(i) IPC by the Anti Land Grabbing Cell at Dindigul on the complaint given by the petitioner herein.

3.The Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn granting such liberty to the petitioner. No costs.

Index :Yes / No

01.06.2023 Internet :Yes NCC : Yes/No cmr To

1.The District Registrar, Combined Registrar Office, Dindigul.

2.The Sub Registrar, Chinnalapatti Sub Registrar Office, Dindigul District.

3.The Inspector, District Crime Branch, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell, Dindigul District.

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

cmr W.P.(MD)No.11258 of 2023

01.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W.P.(MD)No.11258 of 2023 T.Ravi ... Petitioner vs. 1.The District Registrar, Combined Registrar Office, Dindigul. 2.The Sub Registrar, Chinnalapatti Sub Registrar Office, Dindigul District. 3.The Inspector, District Crime Branch, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell, Dindigul District. 4.Ayyathurai 5.A.Selvi ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to conduct an enquiry and to cancel the fraudulent documents bearing sale deed No.2321 of 2009 dated 17.09.2009 and settlement document bearing No.1188 of 2011 dated 20.04.2011 along with power of attorney document bearing number 159 of 2011 dated 30.04.2011 executed by the fourth and fifth respondents in the file of the second respondent within the stipulated time fixed by this Court. For Petitioner :Mr.M.Viji For R1 to 3 :Mr.M.Prakash Additional Government Pleader *****