VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Sundar Raj v. The Director

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
8 December 2023
Bench
N. Anand Venkateshauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 12728/2021

Judgment

O R D E R When the matter was taken up for hearing, it was stated that the petitioner was permitted to participate in the tender after the Writ Petition was filed.

¶2Recording the same, this Writ Petition was closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

08.12.2023 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no Nsr To

1.The Director, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Office of the Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Panagal Maligai, 4th and 5th Floor, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015.

2.The District Collector, Collector Office, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

3.The Assistant Director, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Collectorate Complex, Kanyakumari District.

4.The Block Development Officer, Kiliyoor Panchayat Union, Kiliyoor, Kanyakumari District.

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. Nsr

08.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.9914 and 9918 of 2021 Sundar Raj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Office of the Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Panagal Maligai, 4th and 5th Floor, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015. 2.The District Collector, Collector Office, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 3.The Assistant Director, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Collectorate Complex, Kanyakumari District. 4.The Block Development Officer, Kiliyoor Panchayat Union, Kiliyoor, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records connected with the impugned Tender proceeding in Na.Ka.No.A2/908/2021 dated 14.07.2021, and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the fourth respondent to conduct the said proceeding afresh after providing opportunity to the petitioner for participating in the said tender proceedings, in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Alagumani For Respondents : Mrs.D.Farjana Ghoushia Special Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.