S.Selvam v. S. Kanmani

ORDER The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the fair and decreetal order, dated 30.01.2023 in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in O.S.No. 1121 of 2018 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Trichy.

¶2The petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.1121 of 2018 before the Principal District Munsif Court, Tiruchirappalli. The said suit was filed by the petitioner against the second respondent herein who was arrayed as the sole defendant in the said suit. The suit was filed for eviction and for recovery of possession of the property which was allegedly purchased by the petitioner and the second respondent's mother, namely, Pathrakali Ammal on 07.10.2009 vide registered Document No.114 of 2009 before the Joint Sub Registrar, Town Hall, Trichy.

¶3In the said proceeding, the first respondent filed I.A.No.1 of 2022 to implead herself as the defendant on the ground that there was a Will that was executed by late Pathrakali Ammal as early as on

30.03.2009. The Principal District Munsif Court, Tiruchirappalli has allowed the application filed by the first respondent herein with the following observations: "5. jhth nrhj;ijg;nghWj;J thjpf;F 07.10.2009-k; Njjpapl;Lk;> mNjNghy; gj;ufhspak;khspd; thhpRfs; midtUf;Fk; 30.03.2009-k; Njjpapl;Lk; gj;ufhspak;khs; capy; Mtzq;fs; vOjpf;nfhLj;jhf ,Ujug;gpYk; jhf;fy;

nra;ag;gl;Ls;sJ.

Nkw;gb

,uz;L Mtzq;fSk; gjpT nra;ag;gl;l Mtzq;fs; MFk;. kDjhuh; jug;gpy; 30.03.2009-k; Njjpapl;l gjpT nra;ag;gl;l capy; Mtzj;jpd;gb jhth nrhj;jpy; gj;ufhspak;khspd; midj;J thhpRfSf;Fk; rk chpik cs;sjhf thJiuj;J ,k;kD jhf;fy; nra;ag;gl;Ls;sJ. Nkw;gb ,uz;L Mtzq;fspy; ve;j capy; MtzkhdJ rl;lg;gb nry;Yk; jd;ik cilaJ kw;Wk; nraYWj;Jk; jd;ik cilaJ vd;gij mry; tof;fpy; tprhuizapd; ,Wjpapy; kl;LNk jPh;T fhz ,aYk; vd;Nw ,e;ePjpkd;wk; fUJfpwJ. NkYk; kDjhuh; kw;Wk; tof;F jug;gpdh;fspd;

kw;w

,uz;L

cld;gpwe;j rNfhjhpfis ,k;kDtpy; Nrh;f;fg;glhjJ njhlh;ghf kD tprhuiz nra;ag;gl;lJ. mth;fsJ eydpw;Fk; Nrh;j;Nj ,k;kD jhf;fy; nra;ag;gl;Ls;sjhf kDjhuh; jug;gpy; Fwpg;ghiz jhf;fy; nra;ag;gl;Ls;sJ.

6.

vdNt>

kDjhuh;

kw;Wk;

tof;F jug;gpdh;fSf;F

,ilNaahd

gpur;ridia KOikahfTk;> mWjpahfTk; jPh;T fhz;gjw;Fk;> mth;fSf;F

,ilNa

NkYk;

gy

tof;F eltbf;iffs; Vw;gLtij jLf;Fk; nghUl;Lk; (To avoid Multiplicity of proceedings) kDjhuh; Njitahd kw;Wk; mtrpakhd jug;gpdh; (proper and necessary party) vd;w mbg;gilapy; kDjhuiu mry; tof;F eltbf;ifapy; jug;gpduhf Nrh;f;f Ntz;baJ mtrpakhdjhfTk;> epahakhdjhfTk; ,e;ePjpkd;wk; fUJfpwJ. NkYk;> mry; tof;fpy; Njitahd kw;Wk; mtrpakhf jug;gpdh;fis Nrh;g;gJ njhlh;ghf chpikapay; eilKiwr;rl;lk; fl;lis 1 kw;Wk; tpjp 10 (2)-y; mbapw;fz;lthW Fwpg;gplg;gl;Ls;sJ. "Order 1 Rule 10 Suit in name of wrong plaintiff.

(2) Court may strike out or add parties.- The Court may at any stage of the proceedings, either upon or without the application of either party, and on such terms as may appear to the Court to be just, order that the name of any party improperly joined, whether as plaintiff or defendant. Be struck out, and that the name of any person who ought to have been joined, whether as plaintiff or defendant, or whose presence before the Court may be necessary in order to enable the Court effectually and completely to adjudicate upon and settle all the questions involved in the suit, be added.

¶7NkYk; ,J njhlh;ghf khz;GkpF cah; ePjpkd;wj;jpy; mbapw;fz;l tof;fpy; Kd;jPh;g;Gk; toq;fg;gl;Ls;sJ. Casecade Energy Pvt.Ltd., V Union of India 2018 (1) Writ LR 368 (Mad): 2018 (3) CTC 345 (Mad) Order 1, Rule 10

(2) - Judicial discretion of Court. - Order 1, Rule 10 (2), CPC, is not about the right of a non party to be impleaded as a party to be impleaded as a party, but about the judicial discretion of the Court to strike out or to add a party at any stage of the proceedings. A necessary party is one without whom, no order can be effectively made. A proper party is one, whose presence is necessary for a complete and final decision of question involved in the proceedings. vdNt> Nkw;fz;l tof;F nghUz;ik kw;Wk; epiyepWj;jg;gl;l

rl;lf;Nfhl;ghl;bd;gb

,k;kd mDkjpf;fg;gLtJ

mtrpakhdjhfTk;> epahakhdjhfTk; ,e;ePjpkd;wk; jPh;T fhz;fpwJ. ,Wjpahf ,k;kD mDkjpf;fg;gLfpwJ. mry; kDtpy; ,e;j eph; kDjhuh;> 1-k; vjph;kDjhuh;/thjpf;F Vw;gl;l fhytpiuak; kw;Wk; nghUshjhu tpiuaj;ij <L nra;Ak;nghUl;L ,e;j eph; kDjhuh;> 1-k; vjph;kDjhuh;/thjpf;F &.1000/-nryTj;njhifahf 7 jpdq;fSf;Fs;

nrYj;Jk;gl;rj;jpy;

,k;kD mDkjpf;fj;jf;fJ

vd

jPh;T

fhzg;gLfpwJ. nryTj;njhif nrYj;Jtjw;F Fwpg;ghiz jhf;fy; nra;a ehs;.06.02.2023."

¶4The specific case of the petitioner is that the first respondent is a stranger to the dispute between the petitioner and the second respondent in O.S.No.1121 of 2018 before the Principal District Munsif Court, Tiruchirappalli. That apart, the suit is only filed for eviction and recovery of possession and therefore, there is no necessity for the Court to allow the application.

¶5I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order passed by the learned Principal District Munsif Judge, Trichy.

¶6In my view, the impugned order does not call for any interference as it is intended to bring the finality to the dispute between the children of late Pathrakali Ammal namely, the parties herein.

¶7Considering the fact that the suit is of the year 2018, the Principal District Munsif Court, Tiruchirappalli, shall endeavour to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.1121 of 2018 as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 9 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶8The present Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed with the above observations. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

02.06.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No sn To

1.The Principal District Munsif Court, Trichy.

2.The Section Officer Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. C.SARAVANAN

,J.

SN

02.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.06.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and C.M.P(MD)No.6007 of 2023 S.Selvam ...Petitioner/1st Respondent/ Plaintiff Vs. 1.S.Kanmani ...1st Respondent/Petitioner/ third party 2.S.Prakash ...2nd Respondent/ 2nd Respondent/ Defendant PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decree order made in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in O.S.No.1121 of 2018 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Trichy, dated 30.01.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sakthivel