- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 2 June 2023
- Bench
- S Justice R. Tharani
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 8444/2023
Judgment
ORDER This petitioner has filed the present petition to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner without following due process of law based on his representation dated 24.03.2023.
2.No representation for the petitioner. On the side of the prosecution, it is stated that FIR was already registered.
3.In view of the same, this criminal original petition is dismissed as infructuous.
02.06.2023 NCC : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Index : Yes/No TM To
1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai, Madurai District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Town All Women Police Station, South Veli Street, Madurai District – 625 001.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. R. THARANI,J. TM
02.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.THARANI V.Vivek Kumar ...Petitioner Vs. State rep. by its:- 1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai, Madurai District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Town All Women Police Station, South Veli Street, Madurai District – 625 001. 3.R.Shanmuga Priya ...Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying this Court to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner without following due process of law based on his representation dated 24.03.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Karthick For Respondents 1 and 2 : Mr.S.Manikandan. Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.