- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 16 April 2026
- Bench
- P.Dhanabal
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 7420/2026
Judgment
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 16.04.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL
1.Rajkumar
2.Kochadai
3.Muthu @ Muthuselvam
4.Sonai
5.Kochadai @ Maniyatti Kochadai
6.Sangaiya
7.Muthaiya ..Petitioners/ A5,6, 10 to 14 Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Sub Inspector of Police, Mallanginaru Police Station Virudhunagar District. (Crime No.82 of 2026) ...Respondent/Complainant
For Petitioners:Mr.G.Mariappan
Advocate. For Respondent :Mr.B.Nambi Selvan Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No. 82 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :-
The petitioners/A5,6, 10 to 14, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 118(1), 109, 49 and 351(3) of BNS, 2023, and Section 4 of TNPHW Act, 2002, in Crime No.82 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
¶2The case of the prosecution is that during the temple festival, on 31.03.2026, the petitioners and other accused persons assembled unlawfully, attacked the defacto complainant and their members with dangerous weapons and caused injuries to them. Hence, the complaint.
¶3The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they were falsely implicated in this case and they are no way connected in the above said incident. He would further submit that the the co-accused were released on bail by this Court. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
¶4The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police fairly submits that the injured persons has been discharged from the hospital and the petitioners have no previous cases. However, he opposes to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
¶5Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
¶6Considering the rival submissions on either side and the nature of offences charged against the petitioners, and also considering the fact that no previous cases pending against the petitioners and the injured person has been discharged from the hospital and the co-accused were already released on bail by this Court, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to the following conditions: [a] Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on anticipatory bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate,Kariyapatti, and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at
10.30 a.m., until further orders. [c] the petitioners shall not commit any offences of similar nature. [d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions,
the
learned
Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.
(P D B J)
16.04.2026 vsg
To
1.The learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate,Kariyapatti.
2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Mallanginaru Police Station Virudhunagar District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
CRLeOP(MD).eNo.e7420eofe2026 eeP.eDHANABAL,eJ., eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeevsg eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeORDER eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeIN eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeCRLeOP(MD)eNo.e7420eofe2026 eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeDateee:e16.04.2026
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.