VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Mallika.K v. The Secretary

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
14 August 2023
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 13141/2021

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition is filed for Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 5 to take necessary actions against the sixth respondent based on the petitioner's representation dated 03.06.2021.

¶2Pending Writ Petition, the official respondent has passed an order dated 07.08.2023. Therefor, nothing survives for adjudication. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to challenge the aforementioned order.

¶3Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

14.08.2023

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No Nsr To

1.The Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

2.The Director of Medical and Rural Health Service, Chennai – 600 006.

3.The Deputy Director of Health Services, Viswanathapuram, Madurai – 14.

4.The Joint Director, Family Welfare Department, Usilampatti, Madurai District.

5.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai – 625 020.

S.SRIMATHY, J.

Nsr

14.08.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY K.Mallika ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Director of Medical and Rural Health Service, Chennai – 600 006. 3.The Deputy Director of Health Services, Viswanathapuram, Madurai – 14. 4.The Joint Director, Family Welfare Department, Usilampatti, Madurai District. 5.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai – 625 020. 6.The Manager, Spark Medical Center, 102/1B, Y.Kodkulam near Pandurengal Temple, Arambanoor Main Road, Othakadai Post, Madurai – 625 104. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 5 to take necessary actions against the sixth respondent based on the petitioner's representation dated 03.06.2021 within a time limit as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Saravana Kumar For R-1 to R-5 : Mr.M.Ramesh, Government Advocate. For R-6 : Mr.R.Senthil Kumar

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.