Balasubramani v. The Superintendent of Police

ORDER When the matter is taken up for hearing today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, however the learned counsel appearing for the third respondent represented that already the petitioner has filed quash petition to quash the First Information Report and the same was also dismissed.

¶2The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first and second respondent would contend that already First Information Report has been registered and nothing survives for further adjudication in this petition.

¶3In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents this petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

26.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No aav To

¶1The Superintendent of Police Virudhunagar District Virudhunagar

¶2The Inspector of Police Land Grabbing Special Wing Police Station, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District

¶3The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai

P.DHANABAL, J. aav

26.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :26.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL and W.M.P(MD) No.10116 of 2021 Balasubramani ... Petitioner -Vs- 1. The Superintendent of Police Virudhunagar District Virudhunagar 2. The Inspector of Police Land Grabbing Special Wing Police Station, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District 3. R.Raj 4. Ramasamy ... Respondents PRAYER:- Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents 1 and 2 from interfering in the civil dispute between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent pertaining to the subject property of Survey No.466/1A-Patta No.1727, situated at Kottaipatti Village, Virudhunagar Taluk, Virudhunagar District For Petitioner : No appearance For R1 and R2 : Mr. R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor For R3 : Mr.A.Balaji