VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Dr.R.Nagarajan v. The Govt. of Tamilnadu

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
15 September 2023
Bench
D.Bharatha Chakravarthyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 7382/2019

Judgment

ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer in the present Writ Petition has become infructuous.

2.Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

15.09.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No MR To

1.The Principal Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of Higher Education, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

2.The Director of Collegiate Education, D.P.I. Campus, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 006.

3.The Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Madurai Region, Madurai. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

, J.

MR

15.09.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.09.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY 1.Dr.R.Nagarajan 2.Dr.V.Maheswaran 3.Dr.S.Senthil Kumar 4.Dr.P.Subbaraj 5.S.Pitchaimani : Petitioners Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Director of Collegiate Education, D.P.I. Campus, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 006. 3.The Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Madurai Region, Madurai. 4.Devangar Arts College, Rep. by its Secretary, No.801, Thiruchuli Road, Aruppukkottai – 626 101, Virudhunagar District. 5.The Principal, Devangar Arts College, No.801, Thiruchuli Road, Aruppukkottai – 626 101, Virudhunagar District. 6.Dr.R.Ramasamy 7.N.Gunasekaran 8.G.Meenakshi Sundaram : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the third respondent from withholding the monthly salary of the petitioners citing the management dispute in the fourth respondent college. For Petitioners : Mr.M.Saravanan For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr.M.Ramesh Government Advocate For Respondents 4 to 8 : No appearance

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.