- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 4 May 2023
- Bench
- S Justice R. Tharani
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 8507/2023
Judgment
CRL OP(MD). No.8507 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 04.05.2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI CRL OP(MD). No.8507 of 2023 Ramkumar ... Petitioner/Sole Accused
Vs., State rep., by The Inspector of Police, Thenkarai Police Station, Theni District. (Crime No.141/2023). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.D.S.HAROON RASHEED, Advocate For Respondent : Mrs.M.AASHA
Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.141 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 417, 294(b) and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.141 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
¶2The case of the prosecution is that the accused person was introduced to the defacto complainant by one Maideen Bai, who is the well-wisher of the defacto complainant, to conduct pooja in his house. On 18.08.2022 at about 03.00 the said accused came to the defacto complainan's house and at the time of conducting pooja, he paste some ink on the forehead of the defacto complainant. Thereby, the defacto complainant lost his conscious and the accused had stolen a sum of Rs.1,40,000/- from him. Thereafter, the defacto complainant and the said Maideen Bai met the accused on 22.08.2022, at that time, the accused persons threatened the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint.
¶3On the side of the petitioner, it is stated that he is an astrologer and the defacto complainant approached him due to loss in CRL OP(MD). No.8507 of 2023 his business. The petitioner also instructed to do some Pooja as per astrology and the defacto complainant paid some amount. Thereafter, the defacto complainant asked the petitioner to return back the amount. Hence, there was a dispute. The petitioner received money from him only for Pooja, otherwise nothing has happened as alleged by the prosecution. He also submitted that the petitioner is innnocent and he is no way commited any offence as alleged by the prosecution.
¶4On the side of the respondent, it is stated that the investigation is pending.
¶5Considering the nature of the offence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
¶6Accordingly, this petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Periyakulam, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:
(a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am., for a period of four weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;
(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; CRLeOP(MD).eNo.8507eofe2023
(f) If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC. sd/- 04/05/2023 / TRUE COPY / / /2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. RMK TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PERIYAKULAM. 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI DISTRICT. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THENKARAI POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.8507 of 2023 Date :04/05/2023 SA/VR/SAR.3/17.05.2023/3P/5C
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.