VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Peter .S v. The State of Tamil Nadu

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
4 May 2023
Bench
M.Dhandapaniauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 11373/2023

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to refix the estimation amount in Tender Notification No. Nil, dated Nil in Mudhalvarin Grama Salaigal Membattu Thittam (MGSMT) 2022-2023 (Two Cover System in E-Tender) Kanniyakumari District issued by the 5th respondent as estimated in other District, based on the petitioner's representation dated 24.04.2023.

¶2It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner is the owner of the S.P.S.Earth Movers and Contractors and he is a class-I contractor. The Government of Tamil Nadu, in order to develop the roads in rural areas, invited tenders to strengthen and maintain the roads for five years in 37 districts under the Mudhalvarin Grama Salaigal Membattu Thittam (MGSMT) 2022-2023. The fifth respondent invited tenders in Kanniyakumari District under the two cover system in E-Tender. The two cover system is entirely different from other districts. In Kanniyakumari District, tenders are called for the road quality of 75 mm thickness, whereas in other districts, the tenders are called for the road quality of 250 mm thickness.

¶3It is the further case of the petitioner that if the roads are laid in 75 mm thickness, the roads will not be in a good condition and will get damaged soon. In other districts, 35 lakhs has been estimated to complete 1km distance of road, whereas, in Kanniyakumari District, only 18 lakhs has been estimated to complete 1km distance of road. Hence, the petitioner made a representation dated 24.04.2023 to the respondents for refixation of the estimated amount as allotted to other districts. Since the same was not considered, this writ petition has been filed.

¶4The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that it would suffice, if a direction is issued to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 24.04.2023 and pass appropriate orders on it.

¶5Considering the limited request made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the fifth respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 24.04.2023 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶6With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

04.05.2023 NCC: Yes / No Index: Yes / No Sm/Ssb To

1.The Principal Secretary, Secertariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

2.The Director, Panagal Park, Chennai - 600 009.

3.The Chief Engineer, Panagal Park, Chennai - 600 009.

4.The District Collector, M.DHANDAPANI,J. Sm/Ssb

5.The Project Director, Department of Rural Development Authority,

6.The Executive Engineer,

7.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Road and Bridge, Dated:

04.05.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.05.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.(MD)No.9879 of 2023 S.Peter ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Secertariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009. 2.The Director, Panagal Park, Chennai - 600 009. 3.The Chief Engineer, Panagal Park, Chennai - 600 009. 4.The District Collector, 5.The Project Director, Department of Rural Development Authority, 6.The Executive Engineer, 7.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Road and Bridge, ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to refix the estimation amount in Tender Notification No. Nil, dated Nil in Mudhalvarin Grama Salaigal Membattu Thittam (MGSMT) 2022-2023 (Two Cover System in E-Tender) Kanniyakumari District issued by the 5th respondent as estimated in other District, based on the petitioner's representation dated 24.04.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.L.George Paul Anto For Respondents : Mr.D.Gandhiraj Special Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.