- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 10 May 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan, S Justice S.Srimathy
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 11467/2023
Judgment
O R D E R ********** Heard the petitioner in person and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.
¶2The grievance of the petitioner is that in the Chapel constructed in the petition mentioned site, owing to dispute with a rival group, the petitioner and others are not allowed to offer their prayers.
¶3We wanted to know the character of the land on which the construction had come up. It appears to be a poramboke land. It is not a private patta land. We wanted to know is after getting planning permission and clearance from the District Collector, the construction was put up. The answer is in the negative. We fail to understand as to how a place of religious worship can be allowed to be put up without compliance of the relevant laws. If the construction is illegal, the first respondent is obliged to take action as per law.
¶4With this direction to the first respondent, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. [G.R.S.,J.] [S.S.Y.,J.]
10.05.2023
Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No NCC:Yes/No SJ/SN To
1.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District Collector Office, National Highway 7A, Korampallam, Thoothukudi District -628 101.
2.The District Superintendent of Police, District Superintendent Office, National Highway 7A, Korampallam, Thoothukudi District-628 101.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. AND
S.SRIMATHY, J. SJ/SN 0RDER MADE IN
10.05.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.05.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY S.Fidelis ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District Collector Office, National Highway 7A, Korampallam, Thoothukudi District -628 101. 2.The District Superintendent of Police, District Superintendent Office, National Highway 7A, Korampallam, Thoothukudi District-628 101. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to allow the people to enter into the Chapel and conduct enquiry under Section 147 of Cr.P.C and direct the second respondent to give police protection for the devotees to enter into the chapel and conduct their prayer service peacefully. For Petitioner :Mr.S.Fidelis (Party in Person) For Respondents :M/s.S.Jeya Priya Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.