VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Manimegalai.K v. The Commissioner of School Education

WITHDRAWN DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
22 November 2023
Bench
R.Vijayakumarauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 13422/2021

Judgment

ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner has circulated a letter, dated

20.11.2023 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. In view of the same, this Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

22.11.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : gbg To

1.The Commissioner of School Education, DPI Campus, Chennai-600 006.

2.The Director of Elementary Education, DPI Campus, Chennai-600 006.

3.The Principal Accountant General (A&E), O/o. The Principal Accountant General (A&E), 361, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 018.

4.The Chief Educational Officer, O/o. The Chief Educational Officer,

5.The District Educational Officer, O/o. The District Educational Officer, Srivilliputhur,

6.The Block Educational Officer, Rajapalayam, R. VIJAYAKUMAR

,J.

gbg Dated:

22.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.11.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR K.Manimegalai ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of School Education, DPI Campus, Chennai-600 006. 2.The Director of Elementary Education, DPI Campus, Chennai-600 006. 3.The Principal Accountant General (A&E), O/o. The Principal Accountant General (A&E), 361, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 018. 4.The Chief Educational Officer, O/o. The Chief Educational Officer, 5.The District Educational Officer, O/o. The District Educational Officer, Srivilliputhur, 6.The Block Educational Officer, Rajapalayam, 7.Saraswathi Elementary School, Represented by its Secretary, Puthur-626 111, ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent No.7 to forward the revised pension proposal of the petitioner and the proposal for payment of special provident fund of the petitioner to the Respondent No.6 in accordance with the Rule 19 read with Annexure III (1)(a) of Tamil Nadu Recognized Private Schools (Regulation) Rules, 1974 enabling the Respondent No.6 to sanction and disburse the revised pensionary benefits along with special provident fund with proportionate interest at 12% per annum to the petitioner within the time period stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.Aswin Rajasimman For R1- R6 : Mr.V.Om Prakash Government Advocate For R7 : No Appearance

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.