VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Arumugam K.S v. The Authorized Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
11 May 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor, S Justice S.Srimathy
Case no.
WP(MD) 11509/2023

Judgment

O R D E R Heard the learned Counsel on either side.

¶2The petitioner questions the impugned auction sale notice.

¶3In order to show his bona fide, the petitioner has produced a demand draft for a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees five lakhs only) favouring the respondent. The petitioner undertakes to clear the remaining liability in four equal monthly installments.

¶4The first installment shall commence on 20.06.2023. If the petitioner commits default in paying two successive installments, the benefit of this order would automatically get vacated without further reference to this Court. In view of the partial liquidation of liability and undertaking given by the petitioner to clear the remaining liability in four equal monthly installments, the impugned proceedings are to be kept in abeyance.

¶5Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions stand closed.

[G.R.S., J.] [S.S.Y., J.]

11.05.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : krk / btr To: The Authorized Officer, Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank Limited, Madurai Main Branch, No.51, East Avani Moola Street, Madurai Main Branch, Madurai-1. G.R.SWAMINATHAN , J . and S.SRIMATHY , J . krk / btr and W.M.P(MD)Nos.10007 & 10008 of 2023

11.05.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.05.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.10007 & 10008 of 2023 K.S.Arumugam ... Petitioner -vs- The Authorized Officer, Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank Limited, Madurai Main Branch, No.51, East Avani Moola Street, Madurai Main Branch, Madurai-1. ... Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned sale notice dated 06.04.2023 on the file of the respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently directing the respondent to grant the time for three months period to the petitioner, for repayment of the entire loan amount of Rs.23,23,220.04 to the respondent Bank and pass such further or other orders as this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Udhayakumar For Respondent : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.