Vidhya v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.After going through the materials on record, I am satisfied that the petitioner will have to necessarily establish her status only before the jurisdictional Civil Court. Granting such liberty to the petitioner, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

11.05.2023 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No MYR To:

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Tahsildar, Thiruparankundram Taluk, Madurai. G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J MYR Dated:

11.05.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.05.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.10048 & 10049 of 2023 Vidhya ... Petitioner -Vs- 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Tahsildar, Thiruparankundram Taluk, Madurai. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned online rejection order passed by the 2nd respondent dated 04.06.2022 rejecting the legal heir application submitted by the petitioner in Application Number TN-720220524916 and quash the same as illegal and consequently, direct the 2nd respondent to grant legal heir certificate to the petitioner within the period that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Palanisamy For Respondents : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar Government Advocate