VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Palanichamy. S v. The District Collector

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 May 2023
Bench
S Justice T.V.Thamilselviauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 11645/2023

Judgment

O R D E R The learned counsel on either side inform the Court that the matter has become infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous with the liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

18.05.2023 Internet : Yes/No Index : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order MGA To

1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector,

2.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police,

3.The Inspector of Police, Vada Madurai Police Station, Vada Madurai, Dindigul.

4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani-Town, Dindigul. T.V.THAMILSELVI

, J.

MGA

5.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Vedachandur Taluk, W.P (MD).No.11645 of 2023 and W.M.P(MD)No.10111 of 2023

18.05.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.05.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI W.P.(MD).No.11645 of 2023 and W.M.P(MD)No.10111 of 2023 1.S.Palanichamy 2.S.Perumal ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, 2.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, 3.The Inspector of Police, Vada Madurai Police Station, Vada Madurai, Dindigul. 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani-Town, Dindigul. 5.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Vedachandur Taluk, 6.R.Subramani 7.S.Ramachandran 8.V.Palanichamy 9.R.Murugan 10.P.Thangaraj 11.Nadupatti Karunakaran 12.K.Dhanasekaran 13.V.Kannappan 14.Moorthy ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 6 to 9 to receive vari for the temple festival of Kaliamman, Mariamman deities situated in Ketchanipatty, Thennampatty Village, Vedachandur Taluk, Dindigul District and to permit the petitioners to participate in the festival scheduled to be held on 14.05.2023 and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 5 to take appropriate action against the respondents 6 to 14 based on the representation dated 29.04.2023. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Santhanam For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthikumar Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for R.1 to R.5 M/s.S.Saranya for R.6 to R.11 & R.13

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.