Sekar v. The Principal Secretary to Government

O R D E R Mrs.D.Farjana Ghoushia, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 to 7 and Mr.S.Venkatesan, learned counsel takes notice for the respondents 8 and 9.

¶2The stand of the petitioner is that in violation of the order passed by the third respondent, the impugned construction works are being carried on. The third respondent is directed to pass an order on the dispute now raised by the petitioner, after hearing all the interested parties. Till the third respondent decides the issue, no further construction work will go on. The fate of the petition mentioned works will abide by the outcome of the order to be passed by the third respondent.

¶3Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [G.R.S.,J.] [S.S.Y.,J.]

10.05.2023 Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No Vsm/Sbn To

1.The Principal Secretary to Government, Rural Development Department, St.George Fort, Secretariat, Chennai.

2.The Commissioner/Director, Rural Development and Panchayat Department, Panagal Park, Chennai.

3.The District Collector, Office of the Collectorate Building,

4.The Project Director, Thanjavur.

5.The Executive Engineer, Collectorate Building, Thanjvur.

6.The Assistant Director, (Panchayat), thanjavur.

7.The Block Development Officer, Ammapettai,

8.The Panchayat President, Neikunnam Village Panchayat, Ammapettai Panchayat Union,

9.The Panchayat Secretary, Neikunnam Village Panchayat, Ammapettai Panchayat Union,

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. AND

S.SRIMATHY, J. Vsm/Sbn and W.M.P.(MD).No.10051 of 2023

10.05.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.05.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY and W.M.P.(MD).No.10051 of 2023 Sekar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Principal Secretary to Government, Rural Development Department, St.George Fort, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Commissioner/Director, Rural Development and Panchayat Department, Panagal Park, Chennai. 3.The District Collector, Office of the Collectorate Building, 4.The Project Director, Thanjavur. 5.The Executive Engineer, Collectorate Building, Thanjvur. 6.The Assistant Director, (Panchayat), thanjavur. 7.The Block Development Officer, Ammapettai, 8.The Panchayat President, Neikunnam Village Panchayat, Ammapettai Panchayat Union, 9.The Panchayat Secretary, Neikunnam Village Panchayat, Ammapettai Panchayat Union, ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents No.3 to 9 to construct the Village Secretariate Building at Neikunnam Vilalge Panchayat, instead of Deebambalpuram Akaragaram as per Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme based on the condition No.25 imposed by the third respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.5478/2022/A12 dated 27.12.2022 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 19.04.2023. For Petitioner :Mr.DS.Haroon Rasheed For Respondents :Mrs.D.Farjana Ghoushia Special Government Pleader for R1 to R7 :Mr.S.Venkatesan for R8 and R9