Sakthivel v. The Regional Director

ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the first respondent. Issuance of notice to the second and third respondents is dispensed with.

2.The petitioner availed loan from the third respondent. He claims that he has repaid the same and yet he is being harassed. The petitioner wants this Court to give a direction to RBI to take action in this matter. In a case of this nature, this Court will not be justified in issuing any direction. The other remedies open to the petitioner can very well be availed. With this liberty, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

11.05.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No ta To

1.The Regional Director, Reserve Bank of India, 16, Rajaji Salai, Fort Glacis, Chennai-600 001.

2.The General Manager, RBL Bank Limited (Scheduled Commercial Bank), 1st Lane, Shahupuri, Kolhapur-416 001.

3.The Branch Manager, RBL Bank Limited (Scheduled Commercial Bank), D.No.98, Vakeel New Street, Madurai-625 001.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ta

11.05.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.05.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Sakthivel ... Petitioner -Vs- 1.The Regional Director, Reserve Bank of India, 16, Rajaji Salai, Fort Glacis, Chennai-600 001. 2.The General Manager, RBL Bank Limited (Scheduled Commercial Bank), 1st Lane, Shahupuri, Kolhapur-416 001. 3.The Branch Manager, RBL Bank Limited (Scheduled Commercial Bank), D.No.98, Vakeel New Street, Madurai-625 001. ..Respondents PRAYER:Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to take action against the second and third respondents and their henchmen. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Murugappan For R1 : Mr.K.Govindarajan Standing Counsel