Chandrasekaran v. The Authorized Officer

O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side.

¶2The petitioner questions the impugned possession notice issued by the secured creditor. The petitioner is very well having an alternate remedy before the DRT.

¶3Granting liberty to the petitioner to move the jurisdictional DRT, this writ petition is dismissed. We make it clear that we have not gone into the merits of the matter. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [G.R.S.,J.] [S.S.Y.,J.]

10.05.2023 Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No Vsm/Sbn To

1.The Authorized Officer, City Union Bank Ltd., No.24-B, Ghandhi Nagar, Kumbakonam 612 001.

2.The Branch Manager, City Union Bank Ltd., S.S.Colony Branch, No.1, Kannadasan Main Street, S.S.Colony, Madurai.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. AND

S.SRIMATHY, J. Vsm/Sbn and W.M.P.(MD).No.10050 of 2023

10.05.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.05.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY and W.M.P.(MD).No.10050 of 2023 Chandrasekaran ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Authorized Officer, City Union Bank Ltd., No.24-B, Ghandhi Nagar, Kumbakonam 612 001. 2.The Branch Manager, City Union Bank Ltd., S.S.Colony Branch, No.1, Kannadasan Main Street, S.S.Colony, Madurai. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the impugned order symbolic possession notice dated 28.04.2023 issued by the first respondent Bank under Section 13(4) of SARFAESI Act, R/W Rule 3 of the security interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 to the petitioner and quash the same. For Petitioner :Mr.J.Pandi Dorai For Respondents :Mr.N.Dilip Kumar