- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 10 May 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan, S Justice S.Srimathy
- Case no.
- HCP(MD) 580/2023
Judgment
O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents 1 to 3.
¶2Issuance of notice to the fourth respondent is dispensed with.
¶3The petitioner got married to the fourth respondent way back in November, 2002. The elder son had already attained the age of majority and therefore, no relief could be sought against him. The daughter was born on
27.03.2016 and she is now aged 7 years.
¶4The specific allegation of the petitioner is that the fourth respondent had forcibly taken away her daughter. Since it is a dispute between the husband and wife, the petitioner will have to necessarily move the jurisdictional Family Court or Sub Court for redressal of her grievance and the habeas corpus petition is not maintainable.
¶5Granting liberty to the petitioner to move the jurisdictional Family Court or the Sub Court, this habeas corpus petition is dismissed. We make it clear that we have not gone into the merits of the matter and all the contentions are left open.
[G.R.S., J.] [S.S.Y., J.]
10.05.2023 NCC : Index : Internet :
krk To:
1.The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District.
2.The Inspector of Police, All Women's Police Station, Kolachel, Kanyakumari District.
3.The Inspector of Police, Nithiravilai Police Station, Kolachel, Kanyakumari District.
4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.R.SWAMINATHAN , J . and S.SRIMATHY , J . krk
10.05.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.05.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY M.S.Shaju ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Superintendent of Police Kanyakumari District 2.The Inspector of Police All Women's Police Station Kolachel, Kanyakumari District 3.The Inspector of Police Nithiravilai Police Station Kolachel, Kanyakumari District 4.Anand Barnabas ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of habeas corpus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to produce the body or person of the detenues viz., petitioner's children, Babito Anand (19) and minor Akshara Anand (7), now in the illegal custody of the respondent No.4, before this Court and hand over them to the custody of the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.I.Robert Chandrakumar For Respondents : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 to R3
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.