Kamala v. The District Collector

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.The petitioner aspires for the post of Office Assistant. The petitioner should not have crossed the age of 37 as on 01.07.2022. Unfortunately, the petitioner had crossed the age by then. Therefore, on the ground of age bar, relief is denied to the petitioner. This writ petition is dismissed. No costs.

27.06.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No SKM To

1.The District Collector Kanyakumari District.

2.The Commissioner, Munchirai Panchayat Union, Marthandam, Kanyakumari District.

3.The Chairman, Munchirai Panchayat Union, Marthandam, Kanyakumari District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. SKM WP(MD)No.11835 of 2023

27.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.06.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN WP(MD)No.11835 of 2023 Kamala ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector Kanyakumari District. 2.The Commissioner, Munchirai Panchayat Union, Marthandam, Kanyakumari District. 3.The Chairman, Munchirai Panchayat Union, Marthandam, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent No.2 to select the petitioner for the post of office assistant at Munchirai Panchayat Union, Marthandam, Kanyakumari District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 06.05.2023. Petitioner : Mr.SMA.Jinnah For Respondents : Mr.T.Villavankothai, Additional Government Pleader