- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 10 May 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan, S Justice S.Srimathy
- Case no.
- HCP(MD) 597/2023
Judgment
O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents 1 & 2.
¶2Issuance of notice to the respondents 3 & 4 is dispensed with.
¶3The petitioner claims to have married the daughter of the third respondent. But, no marriage certificate has been enclosed. Only a photograph featuring the two has been enclosed in the typed set of papers. However, based on the third respondent's complaint, a case in Crime No.501 of 2023 has been registered on the file of G.H.Police Station, Trichy District.
¶4The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would state that the detenue was secured and enquired and since she expressed her desire to go with her mother, she was sent along with the third respondent. This statement is disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
¶5We, therefore, direct the second respondent to produce the detenue before the learned jurisdictional Magistrate. The learned jurisdictional Magistrate will enquire the detenue and pass appropriate orders based on the outcome of the said enquiry.
¶6With the above direction to the second respondent to produce the detenue before the learned jurisdictional Magistrate, this habeas corpus petition is disposed of.
[G.R.S., J.] [S.S.Y., J.]
10.05.2023 NCC : Index : Internet :
krk To:
1.The Commissioner of Police, Trichy City, Trichy.
2.The Inspector of Police, G.H.Police Station, Trichy City.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.R.SWAMINATHAN , J . and S.SRIMATHY , J . krk
10.05.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.05.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Yuvaraja ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Commissioner of Police Trichy City, Trichy 2.The Inspector of Police G.H.Police Station Trichy City 3.S.Kalaivani 4.S.Karthic ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of habeas corpus directing the respondents 1 to 2, to produce the corpus or person of the Detenu Sangeetha (aged about 21 years), Daughter of Sekar from the illegal Custody of 3 to 4 respondents before this Court and set her at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Vinothkumar For Respondents : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 & R2
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.