VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Syed Kutharathulla G v. The Chairman

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 May 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor, S Justice S.Srimathy
Case no.
WA(MD) 684/2023

Judgment

J U D G M E N T Heard, Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr.Hajamohideen Gisti, learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr.S.A.Ajmal Khan, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

¶2Tamil Nadu Waqf Board is presently seized of the application for framing a scheme under Section 69 of the Waqf Act 1995, for Kazimar Periya Pallivasal Haqdars Jamath, Madurai. The appellant herein filed W.P.(MD)No.10339 of 2023 demanding that the enquiry must be held at Madurai, since most of the Haqdars are residents of Madurai. The writ petition was dismissed on 27.04.2023 on the ground that Madurai is not suitable for holding the enquiry. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ appeal has been filed.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that he would be satisfied if the five named Haqdars representing five different branches are given hearing through video conference facility / Zoom Meet. This request has been graciously accepted by the respondents also. The following five persons shall be given audience 3 W.P.(MD)NO.684 OF 2023 through Zoom Meet by the second respondent on 15.05.2023 between

11.00 a.m. and 12.00 noon:- 1) Mr.Syed Kutharathulla 2) Mr.Syed Ghouse Basha 3) Mr.Samsudeen Ibrahim 4) Mr.I.S.A.K.Ibrahim 5) Mr.Syed Ahamed Musthafa Each of the above mentioned Haqdars will be given ten minutes each. They will be admitted into the meeting one after another. The aforementioned five persons as well as the other Haqdars can also submit their representations to the following email ID:- tnwb@tn.gov.in The impugned order is not otherwise interfered with.

¶4This writ appeal is disposed of accordingly. This order has been passed based on the consensus arrived at between the parties and this order will not be cited as a precedent. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.) (S.SRIMATHY,J.)

10.05.2023 NCS : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PMU 4 W.P.(MD)NO.684 OF 2023 To:

¶1The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai – 600 001.

¶2The Chief Executive Officer, Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai – 600 001. 5 W.P.(MD)NO.684 OF 2023 G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J. AND S.SRIMATHY,J. PMU W.A.(MD)No.684 of 2023

10.05.2023 6 W.P.(MD)NO.684 OF 2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

1 W.P.(MD)NO.684 OF 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.05.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.A.(MD)No.684 of 2023 and C.M.P.(MD)No.6059 of 2023 G.Syed Kutharathulla ... Appellant /Petitioner Vs. 1. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai – 600 001. 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai – 600 001. ... Respondents /Respondents Prayer: Writ appeal is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Appeal, to set aside the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.10339 of 2023 dated 27.04.2023. For Appellant : Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan for Mr.R.Anand. For Respondents : Mr.Hajamohideen Gisti, for Mr.S.A.Ajmal Khan. * * * 2 W.P.(MD)NO.684 OF 2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.