Thennarasu v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.The petition mentioned JCB is said to be in the custody of the first respondent. The petitioner wants interim custody of the same.

3.When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents pointed out that as many as 6 cases under M&M (D&R) Act were registered against the petitioner herein. Since the antecedents of the petitioner are not good, I am not inclined to grant relief. It is open to the petitioner to move the Court below and obtain appropriate orders.

4.With this liberty to the writ petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.

Index : Yes / No

11.05.2023 Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes/No mm To

1.The Revenue Divisional officer, Aruppukottai Division, Virudhunagar District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Thiruchuzhi Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

mm W.P.(MD)No.11693 of 2023

11.05.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.05.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Thennarasu ... Petitioner /vs./ 1.The Revenue Divisional officer, Aruppukottai Division, Virudhunagar District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Thiruchuzhi Police Station, Virudhunagar District. Crime No.35 of 2022 ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to release the interim custody of JCB, bearing Registration No.TN 56 B 8309 pending disposal of the confiscation proceeding in connection with Crime No.35 of 2022 on the file of the 2nd respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Angusamy For Respondents : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar Government Advocate