- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 12 May 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 11843/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the first and second respondents.
2.The petitioner wants this Court to restrain the registering authority from registering any document in respect of the petition mentioned land. It is seen that the petitioner had already filed a suit before the Sub Court, Kovilpatti on 28.04.2023.
3.The trial Court is directed to number the suit immediately after the Court re-opens. Interlocutory application filed by the petitioner will also be numbered and disposed of as expeditiously as possible. In fact, the petitioner need not have any cause for worry. Since he has already filed the suit on 28.04.2023, any subsequent developments will necessarily abide by the outcome of the suit.
4.With this observation and direction to the Court below, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
12.05.2023 ogy/sji NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. G.R.SWAMINATHAN
, J.
ogy/sji To
¶1The District Registrar, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.
¶2The Sub Registrar, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District. and W.M.P.(MD)No.10245 of 2023
12.05.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.05.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)No.10245 of 2023 S.Seenivasan ... Petitioner versus 1. The District Registrar, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District. 2. The Sub Registrar, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District. 3. Mangathaai 4. S.Seenivasan ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to forebear the second respondent from registering any document in respect of the land in Survey No.184/8 (1 acre 65 cents), 184/9 (1 acre 46 cents) and 82/2 (16 cents) situated at Appaneri Village, Kovilpatti Taluk, Thoothukudi District at instance of the fourth respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramasamy For R1 & R2 : Mr.M.Senthil Ayyaram Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.