VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Chinnathambi v. The Tahsildar

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 November 2023
Bench
N. Anand Venkateshauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 13714/2021

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed for the issue of writ of mandamus directing the second respondent to survey the subject property and to fix the boundary stones and also direct the third respondent to give police protection during the survey conducted by respondent Nos.1 and 2 based on the representation made by the petitioner on 21.04.2021.

¶2When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the official respondents submitted that the survey was conducted by the second respondent and the report of the survey was also placed before this Court. It is seen that the petitioner was also present at the time of survey and has acknowledged by signing the proceedings.

¶3In view of the above, no further orders can be passed in this Writ Petition and accordingly, the same is closed. No costs.

06.11.2023 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no tsg To

1.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Madurai South Taluk, Madurai District.

2.The Head Surveyor, Tahsildar Office, Madurai South Taluk, Madurai District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Perunkudi Police Station, Madurai District

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. tsg

06.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Chinnathambi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Madurai South Taluk, Madurai District. 2.The Head Surveyor, Tahsildar Office, Madurai South Taluk, Madurai District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Perunkudi Police Station, Madurai District. 4.Periyasamy 5.Vellaponnu ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to survey and fix the boundary stones of the petitioner's land in Re-survey No.442/2 and Re-Survey No.442/3 situated at Ayanpappakudi Village Madurai South Taluk, Madurai District and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to give police protection during the survey conducted by the 1st and 2nd respondents by considering the petitioner's representation dated 21.04.2021 within a stipulated period as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Muniyandi For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.R.Ragavendran, Government Advocate. For R-3 : Mr.R.Sivakumar, Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.