G.Sekar v. The Superintendent of Police

ORDER When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the official respondents would submit that already there is a family dispute and with regard to the complaint made by the third respondent, petition enquiry was conducted and closed on 14.05.2023.

¶2Recording the statement made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the official respondents, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

17.05.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Sm To

1.The Superintendent Of Police, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Rameswaram, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. T.V.THAMILSELVI

, J.

Sm

17.05.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.05.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI G.Sekar ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent Of Police, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Rameswaram, Ramanathapuram District. 3.Mahalakshmi ...Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to direct the second respondent not to harass the Petitioner under guise of enquiry in the complaint made by the 3rd Respondent in any way based on the Petitioner's representation dated 13.05.2023. For Respondents : Mr.A.Albert James (R1 & R2) Government Advocate