A.Keerthana v. The Commissioner of Police

ORDER The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner married one K.Ajay Ram and their marriage is a inter caste marriage, which is not to the liking of her parents. Now, the petitioner's family members were facing threat from her parents. Hence, the petitioner's husband preferred a complaint before the second respondent police.

¶2The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that with regard to the complaint given by the petitioner's husband, enquiry was conducted and the third and fourth respondents have given an undertaking stating that they will not disturb the petitioner and her family members any further. Thereafter, no such complaint was received and no threat was found.

¶3In view of the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Criminal Original Petition stands closed.

18.05.2023 Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order sbn To

1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police, South Gate Police Station, Madurai.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court T.V.THAMILSELVI. J., sbn Crl.O.P.(MD) No.9118 of 2023

18.05.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.05.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Crl.O.P.(MD) No.9118 of 2023 A.Keerthana ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai. 2.The Inspector of Police, South Gate Police Station, Madurai. 3.Premchandran 4.Mahalakshmi ...Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to direct first and second respondents to give police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner and her matrimonial family members by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 18.04.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Kannan For Respondents : Mr.R.Meenakshi Sundaram Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 & R2