- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 17 May 2023
- Bench
- S Justice T.V.Thamilselvi
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 8804/2023
Judgment
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 17/05/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI Subbaiah Pandian
... Petitioner/Accused No.2
Vs The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Sankarankovil Taluk Police Station, Tenkasi District. Crime No.28 of 2023. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.Santhanam Rajeshkumar B, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.R.Meenakshi Sundaram, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.28 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/ A2, who was arrested and remanded judicial custody on 05.03.2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 174 Cr.P.C @ 302 and 201 of IPC in Crime No.28 of 2023, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
¶2The petitioner is the husband of the deceased. The complainant is the mother of the deceased. The petitioner suspected the fidelity of the deceased and on 02.03.2023, he committed the murder of the deceased.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case and no specific overt act has been attributed as against the petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 05.03.2023, hence he seeks bail.
4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the investigation is almost completed and no previous case is pending against the petitioner, however he raised objection stating that the petitioner herein had hidden the body of the deceased.
5.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking into consideration the period of incarceration and also taking note of the fact that the investigation is almost completed, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions.
6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties(of which one shall be a blood related surety) each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sankarankovil, Tenkasi District.
(i)the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/concerned court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity;
(ii)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of three months and thereafter as and when required for interrogation by the respondent police.
(iii)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness;
(iv)the petitioner shall not abscond during trial;
(v)On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [vi] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC. sd/- 17/05/2023 / TRUE COPY / 17/05/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. AAV TO
¶1The Judicial Magistrate, Sankarankovil, Tenkasi District.
¶2Do through the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tirunelveli.
¶3The Superintendent, Central Jail, Palayamkottai.
¶4The Inspector of Police, Sankarankovil Taluk Police Station, Tenkasi District.
¶5The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1 CC to M/s.S.SATHIYA CHIDAMBARAM, Advocate ( SR-7406[I] dated 17/05/2023 ) ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.8804 of 2023 Date : 17/05/2023 NA/MMS/SAR- /17.05.2023/3P/7C
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.