VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Pugalenthi v. The Superintendent of Police

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 May 2023
Bench
S Justice T.V.Thamilselviauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 12229/2023

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent to grant appropriate permission and adequate police protection to conduct the "Palsuvai cultural program and Adal Padal" program from 26.05.2023 at about 10.00 pm to next day 27.05.2023 at about early morning 03.30 am, on the eve of the Urchavam festival of Arul Mighu Muneeswarar Temple, situating in Muthur, Ilayangudi Taluk, Sivagangai District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 10.05.2023 within the time limit.

¶2Mr.A.Albert James, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) takes notice for the respondents. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner seeks permission for conducting the "Palsuvai cultural program and Adal Padal" program from 26.05.2023 at about 10.00 pm to next day

27.05.2023 at about early morning 03.30 am, on the eve of the Urchavam festival of Arul Mighu Muneeswarar Temple, situating in Muthur, Ilayangudi Taluk, Sivagangai District. Subsequent to the same, in order to conduct a cultural programme, they sought permission of the police by giving a representation dated 10.05.2023. But the respondents have not considered the said representation. Since no order was passed, the petitioner has come before this Court for the above said relief.

4.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondents police would submit that the respondents have received the representation of the petitioner and the same is pending for consideration.

¶5I have considered the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondents police.

¶6It is brought to the notice of this Court that the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai had issued a circular memorandum in Rc. 007301/Genl.I (1)/2019 dated 09.04.2019 along with instructions to the Inspectors of Police throughout Tamil Nadu for consideration of applications seeking permission for conducting cultural programme. Therefore, in view of the detailed circular and guidelines issued by the Director General of Police, the second respondent police is hereby directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 10.05.2023 and pass suitable orders based on the above said circular.

7.With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

18.05.2023 Internet : Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order ebsi Note: Issue order copy on 23.05.2023 To

¶1The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

¶2The Inspector of Police, Salaigramam Police Station, Salaigramam, Sivagangai District. T.V.THAMILSELVI

, J.

ebsi W.P (MD).No.12229 of 2023

18.05.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.05.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI W.P (MD).No. 12229 of 2023 Pugalenthi ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 2. The Inspector of Police, Salaigramam Police Station, Salaigramam, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent to grant appropriate permission and adequate police protection to conduct the "Palsuvai cultural program and Adal Padal program from 26.05.2023 at about 10.00 pm to next day 27.05.2023 at about early morning 03.30 am, on the eve of the Urchavam festival of Arul Mighu Muneeswarar Temple, situating in Muthur, Ilayangudi Taluk, Sivagangai District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 10.05.2023 within the time limit. For Petitioner : Mr.M.S.Jeyakarthik For Respondents : Mr.A.Albert James Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.