- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 1 September 2023
- Bench
- The Chief Justice, C.Kumarappan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 13270/2022
Judgment
O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE] The petitioners have challenged the notice of possession and the consequential order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate purportedly under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act.
¶2The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 27.06.2022 has directed the petitioners to deposit a sum of Rs.3,50,000/- on or before
25.07.2022 and a further sum of Rs.3,00,000/- on or before
28.08.2022 and granted protection to the petitioners. It is submitted that the petitioners have complied with the said order. It is recorded by the Court in the said order that as on 07.09.2021, the amount of Rs.24,54,842.56/- was the outstanding. More than two years have lapsed thereafter. The interest must have been added.
¶3Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would pay the amount by instalments.
¶4Learned counsel for the respondent No.3/Bank submits that the petitioners are required to pay the amount in lumpsum.
¶5Considering the fact that on 27.06.2022, conditional interim order was passed and the petitioners have complied with the said order, we pass the following order:-
(i) The petitioners shall deposit the amount of Rs.5,00,000/- every month till they clear the entire outstanding amount.
(ii) The last instalment shall be with regard to the balance amount payable.
(iii) The first instalment shall be paid on or before 25.09.2023 and the remaining instalments shall be paid on or before the 25th day of succeeding months.
(iv) In case, the petitioners deposit the amount as directed above, then the respondent No.3 shall not proceed further under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act.
(vi) If any one default is committed of payment of instalments, then the respondent No.3 is at liberty to proceed ahead with the further actions under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act.
¶6The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. W.M.P(MD)No.9419 of 2022 filed to permit the petitioners to file a single writ petition is allowed and disposed of, as they have paid separate sets of court fee. W.M.P.No.9421 of 2022 is closed. [S.V.G., C.J.] [C.K., J.]
01.09.2023 Index : Yes / No
bala To
¶1The Registrar, Debts Recovery Tribunal IV Floor, Kalyani Tower, Melur Road, Madurai.
¶2The Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Court Buildings, Madurai District. THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE and
C.KUMARAPPAN, J. bala
01.09.2023 ____________https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.09.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN and W.M.P(MD)Nos.9419 and 9421 of 2022 1. M.Karthikeyan 2. Vetri Selvi ... Petitioners vs. 1. The Debts Recovery Tribunal IV Floor, Kalyani Tower, Melur Road, Madurai. 2. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Court Buildings, Madurai District. 3. Jana Small Finance Bank Limited, Rep. by its Authorised Officer N.Vinoth, No.10, Krishnapuram Colony Main Road, Mahatma Gandhi Nagar, Madurai-625014. ... Respondents Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the Impugned possession Notice of the 3rd Respondent dated 28.04.2022 and the consequential order passed by the 2nd Respondent dated 01.06.2022 made in Cr.M.P.No.527 of 2022 under section 14 of the SARFAESI Act 2002 and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Suresh For R1 : Mr.V.Malaiyendran Central Government Standing Counsel For R3 : Mr.S.Babu
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.