VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Mm Recreation Club v. The Superintendent of Police

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 June 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 12252/2023

Judgment

O R D E R The writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition, to direct the respondents herein not to interfere with day to day affairs of petitioner club including playing of 13 cards games like Rummy without stakes and for conducting Rummy Tournament among the members of the Club and also from harassing the members or guests of the petitioner club.

2.The facts in brief: The petitioner desires of opening a Club in the name and style of 'MM Recreation Club', with an objective to promote indoor and outdoor games among the members of the club and public. The above said club was registered under the provisions of Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975 and other formalities for the above said building is also applied. Frequently, the 2nd and 3rd respondent's officials came to the club and threatened the petitioner's members and causing disturbances and harassing the members and guests on the pretext that cards shall not be played. The petitioner also informed the respondents that they are not engaged in any illegal activity and paying cost. Hence, the petitioner sent detailed representation to the respondents on

09.05.2023.

3.Heard both sides.

4.Only the above said club has been registered under the Provisions of Tamil Nadu Societies and Registration Act, 1975. But, so far as licence from the competent authority, as per the provisions of Tamil Nadu Places of Public Resort Act, 1988, as mended periodically, proper licence is not obtained from the competent authority so far.

5.Section 4 of the Act reads as under. "4.When any person desires to obtain a licence to use any enclosed place or building for public resort or entertainment, or to construct any enclosure or building for such purpose, he shall send an application to the authority named in Section 5, setting forth the name of the owner of the place or building, its situation, size and description, the material of which the enclosure or building is made or proposed to be made, whether it is or is proposed to be permanent or temporary, and the purpose for which, it is proposed to be used."

6.As per the above said section proper licence must be obtained by the petitioner. Section 5 speaks about the presenting of the application. Section 6 speaks about the procedure to be adopted.

7.Section 4-A of Tamil Nadu Act 54 of 1981 lays down certain conditions which reads as follows: "4-A Conditions subject to which licence may be granted. -Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act or in any other law for the time being in force, no applicable for licence under Section 4 shall be entertained unless the following conditions are complied with by the applicant, namely:-

(a) the applicant shall give an undertaking in writing to the authority or officer referred to in section 5 that the enclosed place or building shall not be used for the purpose of displaying any indecent or obscene play or dance or other like performance or for the activities such as ring-throwing, arrow or pin-throwing or any other activity of a gambling nature as may be prescribed by the State Government in this behalf;

(b) the applicant shall, in the undertaking referred to in clause (a), agree to abide with the provisions of the law relating to the maintenance of law and order and decency in public places;

(c) the applicant shall along with the undertaking referred to in clause (a) also furnish a security deposit for such sum as specified in the Schedule and in such manner as may be prescribed by the State Government in this behalf, for the due observance of the terms and conditions laid down in the said undertaking or the licence to be granted and in the event of non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of the said undertaking or licence, the sum so deposited as security deposit shall be forfeited to the State Government; Provided that no such forfeiture of the security deposit shall be made unless the applicant had been given a reasonable opportunity of being heard: Provided further that the forfeiture of the security deposit under this clause shall not be a bar for proceeding against the holder of the licence under the provisions of Section 9."

8.So reading of the amendment Act also shows that proper application must be presented by the petitioner. So far no such application has been presented.

9.Let the petitioner file proper application before the concerned authority, within a week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Here the concerned authority is the District Collector. On such receipt of the application, the concerned authority shall consider the same and dispose of it on its own merits and in accordance with law, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of the application from the petitioner.

10.With the above said directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

27.06.2023 Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No TM To

1.The District Collector, Sivagangai District.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District.

3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.

4.The Inspector of Police, Kundrakudi Police Station, Sivagangai District.

5.The Inspector of Police, Kundrakudi Police Station, Sivagangai District.

6.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN, J TM Dated :27.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:27.06.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN MM Recreation Club Rep. by its General Manager, Mr.Joseph Thangaraj, S/o.Micheal, No.223/1, B2, Vallamputhur Sethi, Vallam, Thanjavur District. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District 2.The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Vallam Subdivision, Thanjavur District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Vallam Police Station, Thanjavur District. .... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein not to interfere with day to day affairs of petitioner club including playing of 13 cards games like Rummy without stakes and for conducting Rummy Tournament among the members of the Club and also from harassing the members or guests of the petitioner club. For Petitioner : Mr.V.S.Kishok Kumar For Respondents : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.