VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

S.Gangadevi v. The Inspector of Police

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
22 June 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 11382/2022

Judgment

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the F.I.R in Crime No.165 of 2022, on the file of the first respondent.

¶2Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioners.

¶3The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that after investigation, final report was filed and the same was taken on file as C.C.No.19 of 2023, on the file Judicial Magistrate, Theni. After ful-fledged trial, the case ended in acquittal, on 21.03.2023 and the judgment also produced. So, the matter has become infructuous.

¶4Recording the submissions made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

22.06.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Ls To

1.The Inspector of Police Veerapandi Police Station, Theni District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN, J., Ls

22.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.06.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.7179 of 2022 1.S.Gangadevi 2.R.Avadaithai 3.R.Rajendran 4.Gangadharan ... Petitioners Vs. The State rep. by 1.The Inspector of Police Veerapandi Police Station, Theni District. (Crime No.165/2022) 2.Vanitha ... Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records pertaining to the case in Crime No.165 of 2022, on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same. For Petitioners : No appearance For R1 : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.