- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 18 May 2023
- Bench
- S Justice L.Victoria Gowri
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 12212/2023
Judgment
O R D E R This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order passed by the second respondent dated Nil in so far as placing the petitioner in the list of surplus and to quash the same.
¶2When the matter is taken up for hearing today, Mr.J.K.Jeyaseelan, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents would submit that the name of the writ petitioner is removed from the surplus list.
¶3In view of the above, this writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
18.05.2023 NCC: Yes/No Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No akv To
1.The Commissioner of School Education, O/o. The Commissioner of School Education, DPI Complex, Nungambakkam, Chennai.
2.The Chief Educational Officer, Madurai, Madurai District.
3.The District Educational Officer, Melur, Madurai District. L.VICTORIA GOWRI,J. akv
18.05.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.05.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.10447 and 10448 of 2023 P.Arockiadass ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of School Education, O/o. The Commissioner of School Education, DPI Complex, Nungambakkam, Chennai. 2.The Chief Educational Officer, Madurai, Madurai District. 3.The District Educational Officer, Melur, Madurai District. 4.The Headmaster, Government High School, Mathur, Madurai District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the second respondent vide his proceedings Nil dated Nil (Published through EMIS on 04.05.2023) (The same was endorsed by the fourth respondent on 04.05.2023 in the relevant portion) and quash the same as illegal in so far as placing the petitioner in the list of surplus. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Mohamed Suhail for M/s. Ajmal Associates For Respondents : Mr.J.K.Jeyaseelan Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.