Chandra v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has been settled in the Mediation proceedings and hence, the relief sought for in the present Writ Petition has become infructuous.

¶2Recording the above said submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Index : Yes/No

04.10.2023 Internet : Yes smn2 To

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer,

2.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. smn2 W.P.(MD) No.13945 of 2020

04.10.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.(MD) No.13945 of 2020 Chandra, W/o.Padmanaban .. Petitioner Versus 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, 2.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, 3.Subbulakshmi, D/o.K.S.K.P. Ramasamy Naicker 4.Anusuya, D/o.K.S.K.P. Ramasamy Naicker 5.Suganya, D/o.Dhanalakshmi 6.Vijayalakshmi, D/o.K.S.K.P. Ramasamy Naicker 7.Umamaheshwari, D/o.Kanjana 8.Namburani, W/o.Ramaraj 9.Sitharaghavan, S/o.Ramaraj 10.Gowri, D/o.Ramaraj .. Respondents [R3 to R10 are impleaded vide order dated 06.11.2020 in W.M.P.(MD)No.13001 of 2020] Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider and pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's representation, dated 07.02.2020, within a time frame that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.B.S.Meltiue For R1 and R2 : Mr.A.K.Manikkam Special Government Pleader For R6 and R8 to R10 : Mr.V.P.Rajan