VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Shivakkumaar .C v. The Commissioner of School Education

WITHDRAWN DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 November 2023
Bench
R.Vijayakumarauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 12297/2023

Judgment

ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also given a letter, dated

16.11.2023 to the Registry to that effect.

¶2In view of the above, this Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions stand closed.

20.11.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes BTR To

1.The Commissioner of School Education, Office of the Commissioner of School Education, DPI Complex, Nungambakkam, Chennai.

2.The Chief Educational Officer, Ramnathapuram, Ramnathapuram District.

3.The District Educational Officer, Ramnathapuram, Ramnathapuram District.

4.The Headmaster, R.S.Boys Government Higher Secondary School, Paramakudi, Ramnathapuram District.

R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

BTR

20.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR and W.M.P(MD)Nos.10477 & 10478 of 2023 C.Shivakkumaar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of School Education, Office of the Commissioner of School Education, DPI Complex, Nungambakkam, Chennai. 2.The Chief Educational Officer, Ramnathapuram, Ramnathapuram District. 3.The District Educational Officer, Ramnathapuram, Ramnathapuram District. 4.The Headmaster, R.S.Boys Government Higher Secondary School, Paramakudi, Ramnathapuram District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the second respondent vide his/her proceedings in Nil, dated 06.05.2023 through EMIS and quash the same as illegal in so far as placing the petitioner in the list of surplus are concerned. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Venkatesh Kumar for M/s.Ajmal Associates For Respondents : Mr.V.Om Prakash Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.