VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Sivasubramanian .P v. The Director

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
21 July 2023
Bench
K.K. Ramakrishnanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 13382/2022

Judgment

O R D E R This petition has been filed to direct the first respondent to take action on the petitioner's representation dated 23.04.2022.

¶2As per the direction of this Court dated 10.07.2023, the second respondent/ Commissioner of Municipal Administration, No.3, M.R.C.Nagar, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai.32, appeared before this Court, today (21.07.2023).

¶3The learned Additional Advocate General, on instructions from the second respondent, would submit that the entire dues have already been disbursed to the petitioner. However, according to the petitioner, there are some dues. In respect of the same, he can agitate the issue before the appropriate forum.

¶4In view of the above development, nothing survives for adjudication in this matter. Therefore, this writ petition stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

21.07.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No sbn

K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J. sbn

21.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :21.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN P.Sivasubramanian ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director, Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) No.293, M.K.N.Road, Alandur, Chennai-600 016. 2.The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, No.3, M.R.C.Nagar, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai-28. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to take action on the petitioner's representation dated 23.04.2022 in accordance with law. For Petitioner :Mr.D.Venkatesh For Respondents :Mr.T.Senthil Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 :Mr.Veerakathiravan Additional Advocate General asst by :Mr.A.K.Manickam Special Public Prosecutor for R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.