- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 6 November 2023
- Bench
- N. Anand Venkatesh
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 13841/2021
Judgment
O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed for the issue of writ of mandamus directing the sixth respondent to retain the son of the petitioner in the School.
¶2When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the sixth respondent submitted that the son of the petitioner had already left the School during June 2022 itself.
¶3In view of the above, nothing survives in this Writ Petition and according, the same is closed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
06.11.2023 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no tsg To
1.The Chief Secretary, St. George Fort, Chennai.
2.The Secretary, School Education, St.George Fort, Chennai-600 009.
3.The Commissioner School Education, DPI Campus, Chennai.
4.The Chief Educational Officer O/o. Cheif Educational Office, Tallakulam, Madurai.
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. tsg
06.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and W.M.P.(MD).No.10805 of 2021 S.Amuthan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chief Secretary, St. George Fort, Chennai. 2.The Secretary, School Education, St.George Fort, Chennai-600 009. 3.The Commissioner School Education, DPI Campus, Chennai. 4.The Regional Officer CBSE Regional Office, New No.3, (Old No. 1630/A), J Block, 16th Main Road, Anna Nagar West, Chennai. 5.The Chief Educational Officer O/o. Cheif Educational Office, Tallakulam, Madurai. 6.The Chairman Velammal Vidyalaya (CBSE), Velammal Village, Anuppanadi, Madurai- 625 009. ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent Nos.1 to 5 and direct the 6th respondent school not to discontinue petitioner's son 2nd Standard study on the reason the State Government has not granting aid for the during academic year 2021-2022 under RTE Act and ensure the free and compulsory education act 2009 and based on the petitioner's representation dated 26.07.2021. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Vadivel For R-1 to R-3 & R-5 : Mr.P.Thambidurai, Government Advocate For R-4 : Mr.P.Karthick, Standing Cousel For R-6 : Mr.Mariappanmurali
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.