VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

T.Jothi Fathima v. The Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 June 2026
Bench
Mummineni Sudheer Kumarauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 11771/2026

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the first and second respondents to pass necessary orders enabling the third respondent society to settle the Gratuity amount of Rs.4,07,428/- with interest at the rate of 12% from 30.06.2022 till the date of settlemement.

¶2This matter earlier came up for consideration on 22.04.2026 and this Court ordered notice to the third respondent. Though notice was served on the third respondent, none entered appearance.

¶3Mrs.Porkodi, learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 and 2, on instructions, submits that there is no dispute about the entitlement of the petitioner for payment of gratuity to the tune of Rs.4,07,428/- and it is only because of poor financial condition of the third respondent, the said amount could not be paid to the petitioner.

¶4On the other hand, the learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to paragraph No.5 of the affidavit, wherein it is stated that one person by name A.Ranytha Peeris, who served as the Secretary in the third respondent Society and retired from service on 31.12.2022, has been paid all the terminal benefits, including gratuity. But the petitioner is not paid though he was retired as early as on 30.06.2022.

¶5Taking into consideration the submissions made on either side, this Court is of the view that once liability is admitted, it is not open for the third respondent to withhold payment of gratuity amount to the petitioner. The petitioner has retired from service as early as on

30.06.2022, that is almost 4 years ago, but his terminal benefits are not settled as on date. This Court has concluded that the third respondent has no authority to retain the amount payable towards gratuity. This Court does not see any impediment in passing appropriate orders for disbursal of the gratuity amount payable to the petitioner together with interest.

¶6Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of directing the third respondent to pay a sum of Rs.4,07,428/- towards gratuity payable to the petitioner together with interest at the rate of 10% from 30.06.2022 till the date of payment. The said exercise shall be completed by the third respondent as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

12.06.2026 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No CM TO

¶1The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Thoothukudi District.

¶2The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Tiruchendur.

¶3The Administrator,, O.437, Vellalanvilai Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society, 3/6 Bishop Achariya Street, Vellalanvilai, Thoothukudi District. MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR,J CM

WP(MD) No.11771 of 2026 Date : 12/06/2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 12/06/2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR T.Jothi Fathima ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Thoothukudi District. 2. The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Tiruchendur. 3. The Administrator,, O.437, Vellalanvilai Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society, 3/6 Bishop Achariya Street, Vellalanvilai, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents PRAYER:- Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first and second respondents to pass necessary orders enabling the third respondent society to settle the Gratuity Amount of Rs.4,07,428/- with interest at the rate of 12 percent from 30.06.2022 till petitioner's Gratuity benefits are settled. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Saravanan For R1 & R2 : Mrs.K.Porkodi Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.