- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 8 June 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 12364/2023
Judgment
O R D E R Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous.
¶2In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infrucutous.
08.06.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No tta To
1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.
2.The Inspector of Police, Malaiyur Police Station, Pudukkottai District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN,J tta Dated : 08.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 08.06.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Rajendran ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Malaiyur Police Station, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to grant permission and police protection to conduct the programme namely, "Adal Padal" programme on 02.06.2023 at about 07.00 p.m in Arulmigu Sri Muthumariyamman Temple "Kumbabhisegam Festival" in the petitioner's Village (Therku Vaandan Viduthi Karambakudi Taluk, Pudukkottai District) on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 02.05.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Mathavan For Respondents : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Government Advocate(Crl. Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.