- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 2 August 2023
- Bench
- P.Dhanabal
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 13901/2021
Judgment
ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to take action against the respondents Nos.6 to 16 and allow the petitioner and her family members to use common pathway and rejoin in the village based on the petitioner's representation dated 19.07.2021.
2.Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has represented that at the time of filing this writ petition, there was dispute between the parties and now the matter has been settled between them.
3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the official respondents has also represented that already the representation of the petitioner was considered and the matter has been amicably settled between the parties to that effect they also gave statements before the concerned police.
4.The learned counsel appearing for the private respondents also admitted that the matter has been settled between the parties.
5.In view of the above submissions, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
02.08.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : gns To
1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram,
2.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram,
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, The Revenue Divisional Office, Ramanathapuram,
4.The Thasildar, Paramakudi Taluk,
5.The Inspector of Police, Emaneswaram Police Station,
6.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. P. DHANABAL
,J.
gns
02.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.08.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL Gayathri ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram, 2.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram, 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, The Revenue Divisional Office, Ramanathapuram, 4.The Thasildar, Paramakudi Taluk, 5.The Inspector of Police, Emaneswaram Police Station, 6.Nagavalli 7.S.Indhiragandhi 8.M.Amutha 9.M.Indhragandhi 10.Muniyasamy 11.Krishnan 12.Selvam 13.Sudha 14.Sarash 15.Kokila 16.Pappa ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take action against the respondents Nos.6 to 16 and allow the petitioner and her family members to use common pathway and rejoin in the village based on the petitioner's representation dated 19.07.2021. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sathish Kumar For R1 to R5 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi, Additional Public Prosecutor For R6 to R16 : Mr.D.Anbarasu
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.