- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 24 May 2023
- Bench
- M.S. Ramesh, P.T. Asha
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 12442/2023
Judgment
O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by M.S.RAMESH, J.] By consent of both the parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal.
¶2The petitioner seeks for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to hear his suggestions and opinions and include him as member of the Committee if any to be formed by the respondents in the process of framing of the Bills relating to Trusts Act for the State of Tamil Nadu.
¶3The petitioner is the President and Managing Trustee of SR Trust. Earlier a Pubic Interest Litigation was filed by a practising Advocate in W.P.(MD)No.12686 of 2018, seeking for framing of scheme / guidelines, from Supervisory Committees for the proper functioning of public trusts. The Writ Petition was disposed of with certain observations and directions. Taking note of these directions, another Division Bench of this Court had passed orders in W.P.No.13764 of 2022 with directions to the respondents to comply with the earlier directions passed in W.P.(MD)No.12686 of 2018. Earlier in orders passed in W.P.(Civil) No.472 of 2018, the Hon'ble Apex Court had disposed of Writ Petition by observing that some of the States in the Country have disqualified the convicted persons and that the concerned State may consider the same in the proper perspective. Based on the directions of the Hon'ble Apex Court as well as the orders passed by this Court, the Government had framed the Tamil Nadu Public Trusts Act, 2020 and instantly withdrawn the Bill pursuant to the objections raised from various quarters.
¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that pursuant to the orders of this Court, they have also modified and amended their Trust Deed by incorporating a Clause to the effect that a proclaimed offender or a person convicted by a competent Court of law shall not hold, continue or be nominated as Trustee, through a Supplementary Deed dated 24.04.2023. The incorporation of this Clause, in compliance of the orders of this Court, is commendable. Yet, the prayer sought for by the petitioner, if granted would amount to stepping into the legislative domain. However, the petitioner seems to have given a representation on
25.04.2023 for a similar relief and we are of the view that if this representation is directed to be considered by the respondents after due opportunity to the petitioner, in line with the earlier direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court as well as this Court, the ends of justice could be secured.
¶5Accordingly, there shall be a direction to the first respondent herein to forthwith consider the petitioner's representation dated
25.04.2023, after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶6The Writ Petition stands ordered accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [M.S.R., J.] [P.T.A., J.]
24.05.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No
pm/vsm To:
1.The Principal Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Public Welfare Department, Fort St. George, Chenni – 600 009.
2.The Principal Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Law Department, Chennai – 600 009. oM.S.RAMESHoo,oJo. and oP.T.ASHAoo,oJo. vsm W.P.(MD)oNo.12442oofo2023
24.05.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.05.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA W.P(MD)No.12442 of 2023 and W.M.P(MD)No.10543 of 2023 Dr.S.Gurushankar, President and Managing Trustee, S.R.Trust, Lake Area, Melur road, Madurai – 625 107. ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Public Welfare Department, Fort St. George, Chenni – 600 009. 2.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Law Department, Chennai – 600 009. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to hear the petitioner's suggestions/opinions and include the petitioner as member of the committee if any to be formed by the respondents in the process of framing of the bills relating to Trusts Act for the State of Tamil Nadu. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Venkatesh For Respondents : Mr.M.Lingadurai, Special Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.