VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

V.Balamurugan v. The Managing Director

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 July 2023
Bench
S Justice L.Victoria Gowriauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 12646/2023

Judgment

ORDER In view of the fact that the Shop No.3224 to which the petitioner was transferred, was closed by the State Government as a policy decision and that the petitioner is permitted to continue his work in Shop No.3222 situated at Vedasandur, Dindigul District, this writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions stand closed.

18.07.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No BTR To

1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited, 4th Floor, CMDA Building Tower II, Ganthi Irwin bride road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008.

2.The Senior Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited, No.100, Anna Nagar, Madurai.

3.The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited, TASMAC, Dindigul District.

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

BTR

18.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI and W.M.P(MD)Nos.10670 & 10671 of 2023 V.Balamurugan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited, 4th Floor, CMDA Building Tower II, Ganthi Irwin bride road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. 2.The Senior Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited, No.100, Anna Nagar, Madurai. 3.The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited, TASMAC, Dindigul District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order second respondent in Na.Ka.No. 233/2022 - A1 dated 09.05.2023 and quash the same as illegal and unconstitutional and consequently directing the respondents herein to permit the petitioner to continue to work at Shop No.3222 situated at Vedasandur, Dindigul District. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Varadharajan For Respondents : Mr.H.Arumugam Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.