VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Abbas v. The Superintendent of Police

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
21 November 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 11759/2022

Judgment

ORDER This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioners and their family members under the guise of enquiry.

2.When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that based on the complaint given by the third respondent, enquiry was undertaken. During the course of enquiry, both sides appeared and resolved their issues among themselves. Based on the settlement reached between the parties, the said complaint was closed. A copy was also served to the parties.

3.In view of the above, nothing survives for further adjudication in this matter. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as infructuous.

21.11.2023 NCC: Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes/ No PNM To

¶1The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District.

¶2The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Rameswaram, Ramanathapuram District.

¶3The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

G.ILANGOVAN, J. PNM ORDER IN

21.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN 1. Abbas 2. Dowlath Nisha ... Petitioners Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District. 2. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Rameswaram, Ramanathapuram District. 3. Mohamed Sarah Ammal ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying this Court to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioners and their family members under the guise of enquiry. For Petitioners : Mr. Sethu Surendhar G For R1,R2 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.