VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Murugesan.S v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
9 June 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 13521/2023

Judgment

O R D E R This writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent dated 06.06.2023 and quash the same and direct the 2nd respondent to grant permission and necessary protection to perform the cultural program (ie) Adal Padal on

10.06.2023 at 07.00 pm to 10.00 pm in the eve of Arulmigu Sri Madu Adaikalamkatha Aman Kovil Thiruvizha 6th Mandagapadi at Mathakovil Street, Virachilai Post, Pudukottai District.

¶2Mr.R.Suresh Kumar, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) takes notice for the respondents.

3.Heard both sides.

¶4The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner submitted that festival for the temple, by name, "Arulmigu Sri Madu Adaikalamkatha Aman Kovil Thiruvizha 6th Mandagapadi at Mathakovil Street, Virachilai Post, Pudukottai District", is going to be held on

10.06.2023. Subsequent to the same, in order to conduct a cultural programme on 10.06.2023, they sought permission of the police by giving a representation. But, the second respondent has considered and rejected the said representation. Challenging the same, the writ petitioner has come before this Court for the above said relief.

¶5Perusal of impugned order shows that since the cultural program is to be conducted in Pudukkottai District, after getting permission from this Court, permission may be granted to the petitioner by the second respondent.

¶6The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents police submitted that the respondents police are ready to consider the petitioner's representation, if the petitioner give a fresh representation by incorporating alternative place for conducting cultural programme.

¶7The second respondent Police is present before this Court and state that no such previous occurrence took place in the village, when the similary event was conducted in the yester years.

¶8At this juncture, the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner would submit that they are ready to give a fresh representation before the concerned respondent police by incorporating place.

¶9The petitioner is hereby directed to give fresh representation to the second respondent by incorporating place and on such representation, the second respondent is hereby directed to consider the same and pass orders immediately following the order of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court passed in the case of C.Sathasivam Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District and another, in W.P.(MD).No.12535 of 2023, dated 24.05.2023 and in the light of the circular of the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai in Rc.007301/Genl.I (1)/2019, dated 09.04.2019.

10.With the above said directions, this writ petition stands disposed of and the rejection order that has been passed by the second respondent dated 06.06.2023 is hereby set aside.

09.06.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No Indu To

¶1The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ponnamaravathi, Pudukottai District.

¶2The Inspector of Police, Panayapatti Police Station, Pudukottai District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN,J Indu Dated : 09.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.06.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN W.P(MD) No.13521 of 2023 Murugesan.S ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ponnamaravathi, Pudukottai District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Panayapatti Police Station, Pudukottai District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent dated 06.06.2023 and quash the same and direct the 2nd respondent to grant permission and necessary protection to perform the cultural program (ie) Adal Padal on 10.06.2023 at 07.00 pm to 10.00 pm in the eve of Arulmigu Sri Madu Adaikalamkatha Aman Kovil Thiruvizha 6th Mandagapadi at Mathakovil Street, Virachilai Post, Pudukottai District. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Krishna Kumar For Respondents : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Government Advocate(Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.