VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

M.Senthil v. The District Collector

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
16 October 2023
Bench
N. Anand Venkateshauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 14287/2020

Judgment

ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous.

¶2Recording the said submission, this writ petition is closed having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

16.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No sm TO:-

1.The District Collector, Karur District, Karur.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, The Revenue Divisional Office, Karur.

3.The Tashildar, Karur Taluk, Karur.

4.The Tashildar, Manmangalam Taluk, Manmangalam, Karur District.

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. sm W.P.(MD)No.14287 of 2020 Dated:

16.10.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.(MD)No.14287 of 2020 and W.M.P.(MD)No.12936 of 2020 M.Senthil ...Petitioner /Vs./ 1.The District Collector, Karur District, Karur. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, The Revenue Divisional Office, Karur. 3.The Tashildar, Karur Taluk, Karur. 4.The Tashildar, Manmangalam Taluk, Manmangalam, Karur District. . ...Respondents PRAYER:- Petition - filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 4th respondent to rectify the survey no. in the petitioner assignment patta no.43/10 by considering the petitioner's representation dt 11.9.2020 within a stipulated time as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Mathiyalagan For Respondents : Ms.S.Jeyapriya Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.