VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Muraliraj .A v. The Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Education

WITHDRAWN DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 June 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 13023/2023

Judgment

O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2The petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition seeking comprehensive reliefs and also 3 W.P.(MD)NO.13023 OF 2023 questioning the charge memo. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

06.06.2023 NCS : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PMU To: The Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Trichy Region, Race Course Road, Trichy – 20. 4 W.P.(MD)NO.13023 OF 2023 G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J. PMU W.P.(MD)No.13023 of 2023

06.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

1 W.P.(MD)NO.13023 OF 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.13023 of 2023 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.11026 to 11028 of 2023 Dr.A.Muraliraj, Assistant Professor (Mathematics), Urumu Dhanalakshmi College, Kattur, Tiruchirappalli, Trichy District. ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Trichy Region, Race Course Road, Trichy – 20. 2. The Secretary, Urumu Dhanalakshmi College, Kattur, Tiruchirappalli, Trichy District. 3. The Principal, Urumu Dhanalakshmi College, Kattur, Tiruchirappalli, Trichy District. 4. A.Anbuselvan, Enquiry Officer, No.6, Sri Malaiamman Avenue, Melasinthamani, Trichy, Trichy District. ... Respondents 2 W.P.(MD)NO.13023 OF 2023 Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 4th respondent in his proceedings No. Nil dated 24.04.2023 in so far as refusal of engagement of an Advocate is concerned and quash the same as illegal and consequentially to direct the 4th respondent to grant permission for engagement of legally trained person (Advocate) in the domestic enquiry within the period that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Venkateshkumar, for M/s.Ajmal Associates. For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheeshkumar, Additional Government Pleader. * * *

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.