- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 30 June 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 13127/2023
Judgment
ORDER Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents Police would submit that enquiry in this representation has already been conducted and the same was closed.
¶2Recording the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
30.06.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes/No trp To
¶1The Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi District,
2.The Inspector of Police, Aalangulam Police Station, Tenkasi District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN, J., trp
30.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.06.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN K.Komu ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu represented by its The Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi District, 2.The Inspector of Police, Aalangulam Police Station, Tenkasi District. 3.Kalyanasundaram 4.Muthiah 5.Veyilatchi ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction, directing the respondents 1 & 2 to complete the enquiry and to take action against the respondent 3 to 5 for their illegal act based on my representation dated 21.06.2021. For Petitioner : Mr.Aayiram K Selvakumar For Respondent No.1 & 2: Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.