The Secretary v. V.Sugirtha

JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.) The Writ Appeal became unnecessary in view of the fact that the learned Single Judge merely recorded the undertaking given by the learned counsel for the appellant that the case of the respondent will be considered on the basis of the seniority. It is needless to state that the said consideration must be in accordance with law.

¶2Accordingly, the Writ Appeal stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

(S.M.S.,J.) (V.L.N.,J.)

11.12.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Lm S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J. and V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN,J. Lm

11.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.12.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN The Secretary, Chennai Port Trust, Rajaji Salai, Chennai – 600 001. .. Appellant/Respondent Vs. V.Sugritha .. Respondent/Petitioner PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, praying to set aside the order made in W.P.(MD).No.20258 of 2016 dated 26.03.2019 on the file of this Court and allow this Writ Appeal. For Appellant : Mr.R.Murali for Mr.R.Karthikeyan For Respondent : Mr.V.Ilanchezhian