VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Rajkumar.P v. The District Collector

WITHDRAWN DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 November 2023
Bench
N. Anand Venkateshauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 14332/2021

Judgment

O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2In view of the endorsement so made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

06.11.2023 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no tsg To The District Collector, Dindigul District.

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. tsg

06.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and W.M.P.(MD),No.11261 of 2021 P.Rajkumar ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Dindigul District. 2 .The Chief Engineer, Madurai Region, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO), Angunagar, S.S.Complex, M.N.Patty, Dindigul 624 002. 3.The Superintending Engineer, Office of Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO), Angunagar, S.S.Complex, M.N.Patty, Dindigul. 4.The Executive Engineer South Division, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO), Angunagar, S.S.Complex, M.N.Patty, Dindigul-624 002. 5.Selvakumar, The Junior Engineer I Grade, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO), Ayyalur, Dindigul District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing 2 to 5 respondents to provide permanent electricity service connection to the petitioner's house situated in S.No.632/17 in Ayyalur Village, Dindigul District, within stipulated time fixed by this Court and direct 2 to 4 respondents to take appropriate disciplinary action as against 5th respondent in accordance with law and consequently direct 2 to 5 respondents to provide necessary compensation to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.K.R.Manimaran For R-1 : Mr.R.Ragavendran, Government Advocate For R-2 to R-5 : Mr.S.Dheenadhayalan

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.