VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

K.Sathya v. G.Velammal Alias Velthai

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
7 November 2023
Bench
P.B. Balajiauthor
Case no.
CRP(MD) 1622/2019

Judgment

ORDER The Civil Revision Petition is at the instance of the second defendant, who suffered an interim order of injunction in I.A.No.131 of 2018 in O.S.No.62 of 2018, which was filed by the respondents 1 and 2 herein. The trial Court, namely, the Principal Sub Court, Tenkasi, granted an interim injunction as prayed for by the respondents 1 and 2 herein, in and by order dated 06.09.2018.

¶2Aggrieved by the same, the revision petitioner preferred C.M.A.No.57 of 2018, before the Additional District Court (Fast Track), Tenkasi. However, C.M.A.No.57 of 2018 came to be dismissed on

22.02.2019. Against which, the present Civil Revision Petition has been preferred.

¶3Mr.V.Meenakshisundaram, learned counsel for the revision petitioner would state that the suit is in the stage of trial.

¶4Considering that the suit has been taken up for trial and there will not be any useful purpose in revisiting the interim order granted in A.No.131 of 2018 in O.S.No.62 of 2018, way back on 06.09.2018 and considering the grounds raised by the revision petitioner and finding that the issue is with regard to the possession and enjoyment of the suit property, it would suffice, if the trial Court is directed to take up the trial and decide the same as expediously as possible, preferrably on or before

30.04.2024, in accordance with law.

¶5It is needless to state that any observation made in any interim order or in the C.M.A., the trial Court will not be influenced by any interim order or the order passed by the Appellate Court in Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

¶6With the above observation, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Index:Yes/No

07.11.2023 Internet:Yes/No NCC:Yes/No Ls P.B.BALAJI,J. Ls To

¶1The Additional District Court (Fast Track), Tenkasi.

2.The Principal Sub Court, Tenkasi.

¶3.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

07.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI and C.M.P(MD)No.8493 of 2019 K.Sathya ... Petitioner / Appellant /2nd Respondent/ 2nd Defendant .Vs. 1.G.Velammal @ Velthai 2.A.Ganapathi ... Respondents1 &2 / Respondents1 &2/ Petitioners/ Plaintiffs 3.V.Annamalai ... 3rd Respondent / 3rd Respondent / 1st Defendant PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decretal order, dated 22.02.2019 passed in C.M.A.No.57 of 2018, on the file of the Additional District Court (Fast Track), Tenkasi. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Meenakshisundaram For Respondents : Mr.P.Santhana Krishnan for R1& R2 : No appearance for R3

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.